<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0">   <channel>      <title>Oxford Reports on International Law News</title>      <link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/</link>      <description>Oxford Reports on International Law News RSS Feed</description>      <item><date>20 January 2012</date><title>Sanoma Uitgevers BV v Netherlands, Merits and just satisfaction, App no 38224/03; IHRL 3714 (ECHR 2010)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-3714echr10</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Human rights, civil and political rights  -  Human rights, freedom of expression</description></item>
<item><date>20 January 2012</date><title>Ismailov and ors v Russia, Merits and just satisfaction, App no 33947/05; IHRL 3693 (ECHR 2009)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-3693echr09</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Disappearances  -  Human rights, freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment  -  Human rights, right to effective remedy  -  Human rights, right to liberty and security of person  -  Human rights, right to life</description></item>
<item><date>20 January 2012</date><title>Janatuinen v Finland, Merits and just satisfaction, App no 28552/05; IHRL 3700 (ECHR 2009)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-3700echr09</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Human rights, right to fair trial</description></item>
<item><date>20 January 2012</date><title>Media Rights Agenda v Nigeria, Merits, Comm no 224/98; 28th ordinary session (23 October–6 November 2000); 14th Annual Activity Report (2000–1); IHRL 222 (ACHPR 2000)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-222achpr00</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Human rights, civil and political rights  -  Human rights, freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment  -  Human rights, freedom of expression  -  Human rights, right to fair trial  -  Human rights, right to liberty and security of person</description></item>
<item><date>20 January 2012</date><title>Research Foundation for Science Technology and Natural Resources Policy v Union of India and Anr, Appeal of monitoring committee recommendation, Writ Petition (civil) 657 of 1995; ILDC 385 (IN 2005)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ildc-385in05</link><description>Subject(s):  International environmental law Keyword(s):  Civil liability  -  Customary international law  -  International trade  -  Natural resources  -  Pollution  -  Ports  -  Precautionary principle</description></item>
<item><date>13 January 2012</date><title>WN v DMJ, Appeal in cassation, Case no C 09 0236 F, ILDC 1624 (BE 2010)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ildc-1624be10</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights  -  Relationship between international and domestic law Keyword(s):  Children, rights of  -  International law and domestic law, direct effect  -  Treaties, self-executing</description></item>
<item><date>13 January 2012</date><title>AY Bank Limited (in liquidation) v Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (now Serbia and Montenegro), Embassy of Serbia and Montenegro, the National Bank of Serbia, Judgment, Case no 73 of 2006, [2006] EWHC 830 (Ch); ILDC 731 (UK 2006)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ildc-731uk06</link><description>Subject(s):  Relationship between international and domestic law Keyword(s):  International law and domestic law, incorporation  -  Non-justiciability  -  Private international law  -  Separation of powers  -  State succession  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  UN Security Council</description></item>
<item><date>13 January 2012</date><title>Roper v Simmons, Supreme Court judgment, 543 US 551 (2005), ILDC 680 (US 2005)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ildc-680us05</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights  -  Relationship between international and domestic law Keyword(s):  Capital punishment  -  Children, rights of  -  Human rights, freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment  -  International law and domestic law, conflicts between  -  International law and domestic law, consistent interpretation</description></item>
<item><date>13 January 2012</date><title>Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, Judgment [2006] EWHC 345 (Comm); ILDC 379 (UK 2006)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ildc-379uk06</link><description>Subject(s):  International economic law and relations  -  International investment law  -  Settlement of disputes Keyword(s):  Arbitral awards, recognition and enforcement  -  Arbitration  -  BITs (Bilateral Investment Treaties)  -  Foreign investment  -  Investments</description></item>
<item><date>13 January 2012</date><title>Dewhurst and ors v Telenor Invest AS and ors, Summary judgment motion ruling, 83 F Supp 2d 577; ILDC 1474 (US 2000)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ildc-1474us00</link><description>Subject(s):  Immunities Keyword(s):  Civil liability  -  Corporations  -  Corporations, multinational  -  Immunity from jurisdiction  -  Immunity from jurisdiction, agents of states  -  Nationality of corporations</description></item>
<item><date>13 January 2012</date><title>In re S (FC), In re S and ors, In re W and ors (First Appeal) (FC), In re W and ors (Second Appeal) (Conjoined Appeals), Appeal judgment, [2002] UKHL 10; [2002] 2 A C 291; ILDC 244 (UK 2002)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ildc-244uk02</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Children, rights of  -  EC law  -  Human rights, civil and political rights  -  Human rights, right to fair trial  -  Human rights, right to family  -  International law and domestic law, conflicts between  -  International law and domestic law, consistent interpretation  -  Judicial review</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>Narin and ors v Turkey, Merits and just satisfaction, App no 18907/02; IHRL 3704 (ECHR 2009)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-3704echr09</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Compensation  -  Due diligence  -  Exhaustion of local remedies  -  Human rights, right to effective remedy</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>Uzunget and ors v Turkey, Merits and just satisfaction, App no 21831/03; IHRL 3683 (ECHR 2011)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-3683echr11</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Human rights, freedom of association  -  Human rights, right to fair trial</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>ADS ao, Flemish League Against Cancer and Leo Leys v the Government, Constitutional appeals judgment regarding annulment of the Act of 22 December 2009 concerning a general regulation of smoke-free closed spaces accessible to the public, Case no 37/2011; ILDC 1726 (BE 2011)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ildc-1726be11</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights  -  Relationship between international and domestic law Keyword(s):  Human rights, right to health  -  International law and domestic law, consistent interpretation  -  Soft law  -  WHO (World Health Organization)</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>MSS v Belgium and Greece, Merits and just satisfaction, App no 30696/09; IHRL 153 (ECHR 2011)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-153echr11</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Asylum  -  Human rights, freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment  -  Human rights, right to effective remedy  -  Human rights, rights of persons deprived of their liberty  -  Non-refoulement  -  Refugees</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>Toporkov v Russia, Merits and just satisfaction, App no 66688/01; IHRL 3677 (ECHR 2009)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-3677echr09</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Human rights, freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment  -  Human rights, right to effective remedy</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>Centre for Minority Rights Development (Kenya) and Minority Rights Group International on behalf of Endorois Welfare Council v Kenya, Merits, Comm 276/2003; 46th Ordinary Session (11–25 November 2009); 27th Activity Report; IHRL 3591 (ACHPR 2009)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-3591achpr09</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Compensation  -  Development, right to  -  Human rights, collective rights  -  Human rights, cultural rights  -  Human rights, freedom of thought, conscience, and religion  -  Indigenous peoples  -  Property  -  Restitution</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>Petersen v Germany, Admissibility, UN Doc CCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002; IHRL 1882 (UNHRC 2004)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-1882unhrc04</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  ECtHR (European Court of Human Rights)  -  Human rights, equality before the law  -  Human rights, right to family  -  Human rights, right to non-discrimination  -  International courts and tribunals, admissibility of claims  -  Treaties, reservations and declarations</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>Zaunegger v Germany, Merits and just satisfaction, App no 22028/04; IHRL 3698 (ECHR 2009)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-3698echr09</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Human rights, right to family  -  Human rights, right to non-discrimination  -  Human rights, right to privacy</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>Kollar v Austria, Admissibility, UN Doc CCPR/C/78/DR/989/2001; IHRL 1925 (UNHRC 2003)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-1925unhrc03</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  ECtHR (European Court of Human Rights)  -  International courts and tribunals, admissibility of claims  -  Treaties, reservations and declarations</description></item><item><date>20 January 2012</date><title>Plama Consortium Limited v Bulgaria, Award, ICSID Case no ARB/03/24; IIC 338 (2008)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-338-2008</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Attribution  -  Claims  -  Tax claim  -  Investment  -  Investment ‘in accordance with host state law’  -  Standards of treatment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Full protection and security  -  Good faith  -  Non-discrimination  -  Expropriation</description></item>
<item><date>19 January 2012</date><title>Abaclat and ors v Argentina, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, ICSID Case No ARB/07/5; IIC 504 (2011)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-504-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Preliminary proceedings  -  Waiting period—attempt to settle in domestic courts for period of time  -  Waiting period—negotiations  -  Parallel proceedings  -  Consolidation of claims  -  Conduct of proceedings  -  Settlement &amp; discontinuance  -  Admissibility  -  Claims  -  Treaty claim  -  Investment  -  Financial instruments  -  Investment ‘in accordance with host state law’  -  Investor  -  Nationality of investor, individuals  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Consent to jurisdiction  -  Parties to the dispute (and jurisdiction)  -  Standard of review  -  Subject matter of the dispute (and jurisdiction)  -  Remedies and costs  -  Costs and expenses</description></item>
<item><date>11 January 2012</date><title>Pope &amp; Talbot Inc v Canada, Award on costs, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Rules; IIC 196 (2002)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-196-2002</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Remedies and costs  -  Costs and expenses</description></item>
<item><date>10 January 2012</date><title>Czech Republic v CME Czech Republic BV, Judgment of the Svea Court of Appeal, T 8735-01, IIC 63 (2003)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-63-2003</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Parallel proceedings  -  Lis alibi pendens  -  Res judicata  -  Conduct of proceedings  -  Dissenting opinion  -  Review of arbitral awards  -  Failure to apply applicable law  -  Judicial review of arbitral awards  -  Applicable law  -  Choice of law  -  Relationship of international law &amp; host state law</description></item>
<item><date>09 January 2012</date><title>Rumeli Telekom AS and Telsim Mobil Telekomikasyon Hizmetleri AS v Kazakhstan, Award, ICSID Case no ARB/05/16; IIC 344 (2008)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-344-2008</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Parallel proceedings  -  Consolidation of claims  -  Claims  -  Corruption claim  -  Standards of treatment  -  Arbitrary (unreasonable) &amp; discriminatory treatment standard  -  Coercion &amp; harassment  -  Denial of justice  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Full protection and security  -  International minimum standard  -  Most-favoured-nation, substantive matters  -  Non-discrimination  -  Transparency  -  Expropriation  -  Creeping expropriation  -  Remedies and costs  -  Compensation  -  Costs and expenses  -  Damages</description></item>
<item><date>09 January 2012</date><title>CME Czech Republic BV v Czech Republic, Partial award and separate opinion, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, IIC 61 (2001)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-61-2001</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Conduct of proceedings  -  Dissenting opinion  -  Standards of treatment  -  Coercion &amp; harassment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Full protection and security  -  Non-discrimination  -  Expropriation  -  Indirect expropriation</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>EDF International SA and ors v Argentina, Challenge Decision Regarding Professor Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, ICSID Case No ARB/03/23; IIC 353 (2008)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-353-2008</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Arbitral rules &amp; institutions  -  ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes)  -  Arbitrators  -  Challenge to appointment of arbitrator  -  Replacement of arbitrator</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>BG Group plc v Argentina, Final award, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 321 (2007)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-321-2007</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Applicable law  -  Express choice of law  -  Investor  -  Indirect ownership  -  Standards of treatment  -  Arbitrary (unreasonable) &amp; discriminatory treatment standard  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Full protection and security  -  International minimum standard  -  Legitimate expectations  -  Expropriation  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Object &amp; purpose (treaty interpretation and)  -  Remedies and costs  -  Damages  -  Interest</description></item>
<item><date>02 December 2011</date><title>Zehentner v Austria, Merits and just satisfaction, App no 20082/02; IHRL 3639 (ECHR 2009)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-3639echr09</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Human rights, right to property</description></item>
<item><date>02 November 2011</date><title>Paushok and ors v Mongolia, Order on Interim Measures, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 351 (2008)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-351-2008</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Arbitral rules &amp; institutions  -  UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules  -  Conduct of proceedings  -  Interim measures</description></item>
<item><date>01 November 2011</date><title>Hrvatska elektroprivreda dd v Slovenia, Decision on the Treaty interpretation issue, ICSID Case no ARB/05/24; IIC 377 (2009)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-377-2009</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Treaties, interpretation  -  Good faith  -  Object &amp; purpose (treaty interpretation and)  -  Official interpretations by the parties  -  Ordinary meaning (treaty interpretation and)  -  Rules of treaty interpretation  -  Travaux préparatoires  -  Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</description></item>
<item><date>31 October 2011</date><title>Romak SA v Uzbekistan, Award, PCA Case No AA280; IIC 400 (2009)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-400-2009</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Investment  -  Investment defined in treaties  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Subject matter of the dispute (and jurisdiction)  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Object &amp; purpose (treaty interpretation and)  -  Ordinary meaning (treaty interpretation and)</description></item>
<item><date>12 October 2011</date><title>Case of Aloeboetoe and ors v Suriname, Merits, IACHR Series C no 11; IHRL 1392 (IACHR 1991)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-1392iachr91</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Human rights, freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment  -  Human rights, right to effective remedy  -  Human rights, right to liberty and security of person  -  Human rights, right to life  -  Responsibility of states</description></item>
<item><date>10 October 2011</date><title>Pope &amp; Talbot Inc v Canada, Award on damages, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 195 (2002)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-195-2002</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Standards of treatment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  International minimum standard  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Travaux préparatoires  -  Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties  -  Remedies and costs  -  Compensation  -  Damages  -  Interest</description></item>
<item><date>10 October 2011</date><title>Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v Honduras, Merits, IACHR Series C no 4; IHRL 1385 (IACHR 1988)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/oril/Cases/law-ihrl-1385iachr88</link><description>Subject(s):  Human rights Keyword(s):  Disappearances  -  Human rights, freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment  -  Human rights, right to liberty and security of person  -  Human rights, right to life  -  Responsibility of states</description></item>
<item><date>06 October 2011</date><title>Caratube International Oil Company, LLP, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Memorandum opinion, misc action no 10-0285 (JDB); IIC 449 (2010)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-449-2010</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Evidence  -  Production of documents</description></item>
<item><date>03 October 2011</date><title>SD Myers Inc v Canada, Order, 2004 FC 38; IIC 252 (2004)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-252-2004</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Arbitral rules &amp; institutions  -  UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules  -  UNCITRAL Model Law  -  Review of arbitral awards  -  Public policy (Canada, Standard of Review)  -  Standard of Correctness (Canada)  -  Standard of Review (Canada)  -  Investment  -  Investment defined in treaties  -  Investor  -  Indirect ownership  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Consent to jurisdiction  -  Consent to jurisdiction through treaties  -  Standard of review  -  Standards of treatment  -  National treatment, in like circumstances (or likeness)  -  Non-discrimination  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Rules of treaty interpretation</description></item>
<item><date>30 September 2011</date><title>Pope &amp; Talbot Inc v Canada, Rules concerning the Investor's motion to change the place of arbitration, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 194 (2002)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-194-2002</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Place of arbitration</description></item>
<item><date>28 September 2011</date><title>Pope &amp; Talbot Inc v Canada, Interim award, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 192 (2000)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-192-2000</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Standards of treatment  -  Performance requirements  -  Expropriation  -  Indirect expropriation  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</description></item>
<item><date>28 September 2011</date><title>Pope &amp; Talbot Inc v Canada, Award on the merits of phase 2, ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 193 (2001)</title><link>http://www.oxfordlawreports.com:80/subscriber_article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-193-2001</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Standards of treatment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  International minimum standard  -  National treatment  -  National treatment, aims and effect test  -  National treatment, de facto treatment  -  National treatment, de jure treatment  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</description></item>   </channel></rss> 
